[Review] INNO 3D,
KYRO2000
-Display
Quality & Performance
StrongTribe/highend1@technoa.co.kr
Display Quality
I thought thoughtfully how to test KYRO's display quality. at first, i played
DVD to watch a display quality of movie. to objectly compare display qualty of
3D i choose GeForce 256. i captured a screen shot of MidNight GT(bundle-software)
The first, display quality of DVD movie
|
|
(Click to view enlarged picture) |
You also can see broken screen when objcet in screen move quickly if you
played a DVD movie with graphic card that does not support hardware motion
compensating. but KYRO supports that technology. no problem with watching DVD.
It's really hard to say 2D display quality because all users have all
diffrent opinion. it can't be shown as a table containing numbers. but said 2D
display quality, KYRO show me deep color and clearness. it emphasize a red color
little bit. it's comfortable when i read a characters on monitor. but in high
resolution , for example 1600 X 1200 at 75Hz KYRO and my monitor make me to drop
tears. this graphic card doesn't proper who wanna high resolution.
I captured some pictures to see display quality of 3D. i didn't touch any
option means default setting. standard is 1024 X 768 with 32bit. it apllied also
MidNight.
The first picture from MidNight GT show gloomy cement. but you can see clear
cement with KYRO.this turn is to test on 3D mark 2000, especially in Game
Adventure. you can classfy display quality of 3D when you compare aboved
pictures.
the rumor on internet that KYRO has a good quality of 3D proved to be true.
but it will be a garbage if the speed(Frame per Second) is too slow to play game
even though it show me good 3D quality.
3D Speed Benchmark
the target that compare with KYRO is Shell Micro's Infinity
GeForce2 MX. spec is followed.
Test PC
CPU
|
Intel Pentium iii 733EB
|
Main Board
|
ASUS CUSL2-C(i815ep)
|
Memory
|
Hyundai PC133 128MB
|
HDD
|
Maxtor 30GB 5400RPM ATA/100 (Model :
33073H3)
|
OS
|
MicroSoft Windows 98 se (English)
|
Driver
|
NVIDIA Detonator 6.50 / KYRO 1.0
|
OS
|
MicroSoft Windows 98 se (English)
|
3D Mark 2000 1.1 16BIT
Winner is MX.! you need to pay attemtion to
result of low resolution.
3D Mark 2000 1.1 32BIT
winner is KYRO2000
because the result from 800 X 600 show better performance than MX do.
3D WinBench 2000 16BIT
3D WinBench 2000 32BIT
Quake 3 Arena 16BIT
Quake 3 Arena 32BIT
KYRO has good performance after
800 X 600 in quake 3. 800 X 600 and 1024 X 768 with 32 bit are used to
be played for most of all user. it mean really performance of KYRO is
better than MX. table whisper you had better choose KYRO if you maintain
ATI's 2D quality and MX's pretty good 3D quality and speed at the same
time.
¡¡ |